Coggon’s remarks on a previous paper on active and passive euthanasia elicit a clarification and an elaboration of the argument in support of the claim that there is a moral difference between killing and letting die. The relevant moral duties are different in nature, strength and content. Moreover, not all people who are involved in the relevant situations have the same moral duties. The particular case that is presented in support of the claim that to kill is not the same as to let die is based upon a rejection of consequentialism.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None declared.
Provenance and Peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
↵i I discuss this issue further elsewhere (McLachlan, in press).5
↵ii For a discussion of “alldependsism”, see McLachlan, 2005.6
↵iii I am not against legalised active euthanasia as such if appropriate legislation can be framed, but I am against allowing doctors to perform it. In my view, whether or not active euthanasia might be morally permissible, it should never be legally permissible for a doctor, particularly a doctor who is responsible for providing medical treatment for the person concerned, to do it. I hope to pursue this point in future publications.
↵iv I discuss this issue further elsewhere (McLachlan, in press).5
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- On acts, omissions and responsibility
- The ethics of killing and letting die: active and passive euthanasia
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- Moral duties and euthanasia: why to kill is not necessarily the same as to let die
- Passive euthanasia
- Moral dimensions
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- The ethics of and the appropriate legislation concerning killing people and letting them die: a response to Merkel
- Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
- A defence of a new perspective on euthanasia