Article Text
Abstract
Based on extensive questionnaire data, this paper focuses on parents’ views about children’s right to decide about participation in research. The data originates from 4000 families participating in a longitudinal prospective screening as 1997. Although current regulations and recommendations underline that children should have influence over their participation, many parents in this study disagree. Most (66%) were positive providing information to the child about relevant aspects of the study. However, responding parents were split about whether or not children should at some point be allowed decisional authority when participating in research: 41.6% of the parents reported being against or unsure. Those who responded positively believed that children should be allowed to decide about blood-sampling procedures (70%), but to a less extent about participation (48.5%), analyses of samples (19.7%) and biological bank storage (15.4%). That as many as possible should remain in the study, and that children do not have the competence to understand the consequences for research was strongly stressed by respondents who do not think children should have a right to decide. When asked what interests they consider most important in paediatric research, child autonomy and decision-making was ranked lowest. We discuss the implications of these findings.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding: This research has been funded by the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research (FAS) and the Swedish Research Council (VR). They have had no influence over the research or the results. The authors have been independent from the funders in both conception and execution of the study.
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethics approval: The study and its protocol (including the questionnaire) were approved by the regional ethics committees at Lund University and Linkoping University.
Provenance and Peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Why collaborate with children in health research: an analysis of the risks and benefits of collaboration with children
- Children in health research: a matter of trust
- Why do parents enrol their children in research: a narrative synthesis
- Hearing the voices of children: self-reported information on children's experiences during research procedures: a study protocol
- Quantitative valuation placed by children and teenagers on participation in two hypothetical research scenarios
- A critical examination of research narratives ‘rumours’ and passive community resistance in medical research
- Perspectives of adult offspring of participants recruited to a randomised trial in pregnancy: a qualitative study
- ‘I actually felt like I was a researcher myself.’ On involving children in the analysis of qualitative paediatric research in the Netherlands
- Children, Gillick competency and consent for involvement in research
- Ethics in studies on children and environmental health