Article Text
Paper
Is all fair in biological warfare? The controversy over genetically engineered biological weapons
Abstract
Advances in genetics may soon make possible the development of ethnic bioweapons that target specific ethnic or racial groups based upon genetic markers. While occasional published reports of such research generate public outrage, little has been written about the ethical distinction (if any) between the development of such weapons and ethnically neutral bioweapons. The purpose of this paper is to launch a debate on the subject of ethnic bioweapons before they become a scientific reality.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Provenance and Peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Fighting biological warfare
- Surveillance of bacterial disease in wartime Ukraine
- Science for evil: the scientist's dilemma
- Biological warfare and bioterrorism
- Abhorrent weapons and “superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering”: from field surgery to law
- Creating a ‘FatherConfessor’: the origins of research ethics committees in UK military medical research, 1950–1970. Part I, context and causes
- Undergraduate teaching on biological weapons and bioterrorism at medical schools in the UK and the Republic of Ireland: results of a cross-sectional study
- Weapons of mass destruction—threats and responses
- Unit 731 and moral repair
- Military and occupational exposures among Veterans in the Million Veteran Program by survey self-report: a descriptive study