In contrast to most Western countries, routine offer of prenatal screening is considered problematic in the Netherlands. The main argument against offering it to every pregnant woman is that women would be brought into a moral dilemma when deciding whether to use screening or not. This paper explores whether the active offer of a prenatal screening test indeed confronts women with a moral dilemma. A qualitative study was developed, based on a randomised controlled trial that aimed to assess the decision-making process of women when confronted with a test offer. A sample of 59 women was interviewed about the different factors balanced in decision-making. Participants felt themselves caught between a need for knowledge and their unwillingness to take on responsibility. Conflict was reported between wishes, preferences and ethical views regarding parenthood; however, women did not seem to be caught in a choice between two or more ethical principles. Participants balanced the interests of the family against that of the fetus in line with their values and their personal circumstances. Therefore, we conclude that they are not so much faced with an ethical dilemma as conflicting interests. We propose that caregivers should provide the opportunity for the woman to discuss her wishes and doubts to facilitate her decision. This approach would help women to assess the meaning of testing within their parental duties towards their unborn child and their current offspring.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Women's views on the moral status of nature in the context of prenatal screening decisions
- Hostile environments? Down’s syndrome and genetic screening in contemporary culture
- Parental duties and untreatable genetic conditions
- After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?
- Exceptional know how? Possible pitfalls of routinising genetic services
- Ethics of routine: a critical analysis of the concept of ‘routinisation’ in prenatal screening
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- Terminating pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis—with a little help of professional ethics?
- Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access
- Trisomy 21 in both fetuses in a DCDA twin pregnancy