Three recent empirical studies on the use of placebos and two papers arguing for the deliberate use of placebos in clinical practice are analysed. Empirical studies demonstrate that placebos are commonly used. The concept of the placebo is currently understood in different ways, many of which do not refer to inert substances or treatments. The papers arguing for the use of placebos are shown to fail to make their case.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding: The Finnish Cultural Foundation has supported my work.
Competing interests: None declared.
Provenance and Peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- What do we really know about the deliberate use of placebos in clinical practice?
- Deliberate use of placebos in clinical practice: what we really know
- Physician perspectives on placebo ethics
- Rethinking the placebo effect
- Patient attitudes about the clinical use of placebo: qualitative perspectives from a telephone survey
- The ethics of placebo treatments in clinical practice: a reply to Glackin
- More than consent for ethical open-label placebo research
- Placebo effects and the molecular biological components involved
- Questionnaire survey on use of placebo
- Patients’ attitudes about the use of placebo treatments: telephone survey