Responses

Download PDFPDF
Medical students’ attitudes to abortion: a comparison between Queen’s University Belfast and the University of Oslo
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Students' attitudes towards abortion are not comparable
    • Souhail Alouini, Obstetrician and Gynaecologist, M.D., Ph.D .
    • Other Contributors:
      • Goda Venslauskaite, Christian Hervé

    Rosie Steele (1) reports that medical students without religious affiliation of Oslo and Belfast universities are mainly pro-choice. However, it is surprising that 48% of Norwegian students do not have religious affiliation, whereas only 4.7% of Irish students do not have it. Why was the rate of religious affiliation approximately ten times superior in Irish students' group than in the Norwegian one? An explanation needs to b...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.