Article Text
Abstract
Background: Abortion policy varies significantly between Northern Ireland and Norway. This is the first study to compare medical students’ attitudes towards abortion in two different countries.
Objective: To assess medical students’ attitudes to abortion at the University of Oslo (UiO) and Queen’s University Belfast (QUB).
Design: An anonymous questionnaire completed by 59 medical students at UiO and 86 medical students at QUB.
Participants: Students who had completed their obstetrics and gynaecology placements during 2006/2007.
Results: The students’ responses (UiO versus QUB) were as follows: response rate, 95.2% vs 92.5%; stated no religious affiliation, 48.0% vs 4.7%; pro-abortion, 78.2% vs 14.3% (χ2 = 58.160, p<0.001); had seen an abortion while studying medicine, 74.6% vs 9.4% (χ2 = 73.183, p<0.001); in favour of abortion when there was a threat to the mother’s life, 100% vs 93.3% (χ2 = 6.143, p = 0.150); in favour of providing abortion on the mother’s request, 86.4% vs 9.3% (χ2 = 42.067, p<0.001); in agreement that women should have access to free abortion services (mean value on a 5-point Likert scale 1.69 out of 5), versus in disagreement (mean 3.76, p<0.001).
Conclusion: There were significant differences in students’ attitudes to abortion, reflecting differences in religious, legal and educational experiences.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding: A medical student elective bursary was provided by the Institute of Medical Ethics.
Competing interests: None declared.
Ethics approval: Ethics approval was obtained from the research ethics committee of School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast (reference number 07/01).
Provenance and Peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Season of the first trimester of pregnancy predicts sensitisation to food allergens in childhood: a population - based cohort study from Finland
- W George Irwin
- The fox and the grapes: an Anglo-Irish perspective on conscientious objection to the supply of emergency hormonal contraception without prescription
- Patients, not criminals: Northern Ireland grapples with how to provide legal abortion
- Abortion regulation in Europe in the era of COVID-19: a spectrum of policy responses
- Can we reduce costs and prevent more unintended pregnancies? A cost of illness and cost - effectiveness study comparing two methods of EHC
- Secular trends in heart rate in young adults, 1949 to 2004: analyses of cross sectional studies
- Perception of modern radiotherapy learning: study protocol for a mixed - methods analysis of trainees and trainers at a UK cancer centre
- George Adams
- Update on congenital heart disease and sudden infant / perinatal death: from history to future trends