Article Text
Abstract
Criticism of ethical review of research continues and research ethics committees (RECs) need to demonstrate that they are “fit for purpose” by meeting acknowledged standards of process, debate and outcome. This paper reports a workshop in Warsaw in April 2008, organised by the European Forum for Good Clinical Practice, on the problems of setting standards for RECs in the European Union. Representatives from 27 countries were invited; 16 were represented. Problems identified were the limited and variable resources, difficulties of setting standards for ethical debate and its outcomes and that REC members, as volunteers, may resent the imposition of standards. Other ways to set standards were discussed, including analysis of current multicentre review, collecting REC member reports for review, learning from appeals and feedback from applicants, and use of other regional and national meetings. The place of a central, national board or ethics committee was debated as was the need for collaborating with partners in other fields.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
- Commentaries
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- How can we provide effective training for research ethics committee members? A European assessment
- Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries
- Prisoners as research participants: current practice and attitudes in the UK
- Lay REC members: patient or public?
- Legislative regulation and ethical governance of medical research in different European Union countries
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions
- More guidelines on research ethics?
- A syllabus for research ethics committees: training needs and resources in different European countries
- Should research ethics committees meet in public?
- Research ethics committees in Europe: implementing the directive, respecting diversity