Article info
PDFPaper
Enhancement and human nature: the case of Sandel
- Dr T Lewens, Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RH, UK; tml1000{at}cam.ac.uk
Citation
Enhancement and human nature: the case of Sandel
Publication history
- Received November 20, 2008
- Revised November 20, 2008
- Accepted March 31, 2009
- First published May 29, 2009.
Online issue publication
May 29, 2009
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Good parents would not fulfil their obligation to genetically enhance their unborn children
- ‘My child will never initiate Ultimate Harm’: an argument against moral enhancement
- Reproductive technologies, risk, enhancement and the value of genetic relatedness
- A Nietzschean critique of liberal eugenics
- Getting beyond the welfare of the child in assisted reproduction
- Possible people, complaints, and the distinction between genetic planning and genetic engineering
- Better to hesitate at the threshold of compulsion: PKU testing and the concept of family autonomy in Eire
- Bioethics: why philosophy is essential for progress
- Sexism and human enhancement
- American biofutures: ideology and utopia in the Fukuyama/Stock debate