Article info
PDFResponse
Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed
- Dr C Strong, Department of Human Values and Ethics, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison Avenue, Suite 311-313, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, USA; cstrong{at}utmem.edu
Citation
Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed
Publication history
- Received February 3, 2009
- Accepted February 27, 2009
- First published April 30, 2009.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Abortion: Strong’s counterexamples fail
- Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the ‘future like ours’ argument
- A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”
- Strong's objections to the future of value account
- On how to interpret the role of the future within the abortion debate
- Savulescu’s objections to the future of value argument
- A future like ours revisited
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- Abortion and human nature
- The morality of abortion and the deprivation of futures