Other content recommended for you
- Physiological effects of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation surgery in cervical dystonia
- Long-term subthalamic nucleus stimulation improves sensorimotor integration and proprioception
- Which target is best for patients with Parkinson's disease? A meta-analysis of pallidal and subthalamic stimulation
- Effects of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on dysarthrophonia in Parkinson’s disease
- Effect of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation on dual-task cognitive and motor performance in isolated dystonia
- Effects of deep brain stimulation of dorsal versus ventral subthalamic nucleus regions on gait and balance in Parkinson's disease
- Different patterns of medication change after subthalamic or pallidal stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: target related effect or selection bias?
- Deep brain stimulation in the caudal zona incerta versus best medical treatment in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a randomised blinded evaluation
- Sweets for my sweet: modulation of the limbic system drives salience for sweet foods after deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease
- Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders
Jump to comment:
In J Med Ethics 2009 (35) Walter Glannon [i] claims that deep brain stimulation (DBS) improves symptoms of some conditions, but could also have impact on thought, personality, and behaviour. His argument – although rich and in detail – misses three important points:
(1) Why should the disruption of thematic unity of one`s life story always be a harm? Glannon appeals to our intuitions when he claims that cohere...