Article info
PDFLetter
Inappropriate conclusions in research on assisted dying
- Dr L J Materstvedt, Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway; lars.johan.materstvedt{at}hf.ntnu.no
Citation
Inappropriate conclusions in research on assisted dying
Publication history
- Received January 18, 2008
- Accepted January 24, 2008
- First published March 30, 2009.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups
- Of dilemmas and tensions: a qualitative study of palliative care physicians’ positions regarding voluntary active euthanasia in Quebec, Canada
- Responses to assisted suicide requests: an interview study with Swiss palliative care physicians
- When slippery slope arguments miss the mark: a lesson from one against physician-assisted death
- Assisted suicide and euthanasia in Switzerland: allowing a role for non-physicians
- Role of non-governmental organisations in physician assisted suicide
- Suicide assisted by two Swiss right-to-die organisations
- The acceptability of ending a patient’s life
- Euthanasia: above ground, below ground
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven