Article Text
PDFLetter
Inappropriate conclusions in research on assisted dying
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Legal physician - assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “ vulnerable ” groups
- Prevalence of depression in granted and refused requests for euthanasia and assisted suicide: a systematic review
- Responses to assisted suicide requests: an interview study with Swiss palliative care physicians
- Increase in assisted suicide in Switzerland: did the socioeconomic predictors change? Results from the Swiss National Cohort
- Of dilemmas and tensions: a qualitative study of palliative care physicians ’ positions regarding voluntary active euthanasia in Quebec, Canada
- Suicide assisted by two Swiss right - to - die organisations
- Half truths and one and a half truths about assisted dying
- Organ donation after medical assistance in dying or cessation of life - sustaining treatment requested by conscious patients: the Canadian context
- When slippery slope arguments miss the mark: a lesson from one against physician - assisted death
- Euthanasia: above ground, below ground