Article Text
PDFLetter
Inappropriate conclusions in research on assisted dying
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
2009 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups
- Of dilemmas and tensions: a qualitative study of palliative care physicians’ positions regarding voluntary active euthanasia in Quebec, Canada
- Responses to assisted suicide requests: an interview study with Swiss palliative care physicians
- When slippery slope arguments miss the mark: a lesson from one against physician-assisted death
- Assisted suicide and euthanasia in Switzerland: allowing a role for non-physicians
- Role of non-governmental organisations in physician assisted suicide
- Suicide assisted by two Swiss right-to-die organisations
- The acceptability of ending a patient’s life
- Euthanasia: above ground, below ground
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven