Article Text
Letter
Inappropriate conclusions in research on assisted dying
Statistics from Altmetric.com
In a recent paper in the Journal of Medical Ethics the authors conclude: “Where assisted dying is already legal, there is no current evidence for the claim that legalised PAS [physician assisted suicide] or euthanasia will have disproportionate impact on patients in vulnerable groups.”1 This kind of social medicine research gives an important insight into socio-economic and cultural aspects of assisted dying—even though, it must be added, there is not much new in …
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups
- Of dilemmas and tensions: a qualitative study of palliative care physicians’ positions regarding voluntary active euthanasia in Quebec, Canada
- Responses to assisted suicide requests: an interview study with Swiss palliative care physicians
- When slippery slope arguments miss the mark: a lesson from one against physician-assisted death
- Assisted suicide and euthanasia in Switzerland: allowing a role for non-physicians
- Role of non-governmental organisations in physician assisted suicide
- Suicide assisted by two Swiss right-to-die organisations
- The acceptability of ending a patient’s life
- Euthanasia: above ground, below ground
- The case for physician assisted suicide: not (yet) proven