A study found that women participating in mammography screening were content with the programme and the paternalistic invitations that directly encourage participation and include a pre-specified time of appointment. We argue that this merely reflects that the information presented to the invited women is seriously biased in favour of participation. Women are not informed about the major harms of screening, and the decision to attend has already been made for them by a public authority. This short-circuits informed decision-making and the legislation on informed consent, and violates the autonomy of the women. Screening invitations must present both benefits and harms in a balanced fashion, and should offer, not encourage, participation. It should be stated clearly that the choice not to participate is as sensible as the choice to do so. To allow this to happen, the responsibility for the screening programmes must be separated from the responsibility for the information material.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Prognosis in women with interval breast cancer: population based observational cohort study
- Psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms in the UK
- Utilisation of preventative health check-ups in the UK: findings from individual-level repeated cross-sectional data from 1992 to 2008
- Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography
- Importance of quality in breast cancer screening practice – a natural experiment in Alberta, Canada
- Presentation on websites of possible benefits and harms from screening for breast cancer: cross sectional study
- Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme
- Could screening participation bias symptom interpretation? An interview study on women's interpretations of and responses to cancer symptoms between mammography screening rounds
- Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial
- Women’s conceptual knowledge about breast cancer screening and overdiagnosis in Norway: a cross-sectional study