One of the major concerns about surrogacy is the potential harm that may be inflicted upon the surrogate mother and the child after relinquishment. Even if one were to take the liberal view that surrogacy should be presumptively allowed on the basis of autonomy and/or compassion, evidence of harm must be taken seriously. In this paper I review the evidence from psychological studies on the effect that relinquishing a child has on the surrogate mother and while it appears that many surrogates are able to cope with relinquishment, I argue that there are good reasons, grounded in empirical evidence, to support the view that the subsequent management of the relinquishment necessarily objectifies the surrogate mother.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Commercial surrogacy: how provisions of monetary remuneration and powers of international law can prevent exploitation of gestational surrogates
- So not mothers: responsibility for surrogate orphans
- Surrogacy: beyond the commercial/altruistic distinction
- Taming the international commercial surrogacy industry
- One mum too few: maternal status in host surrogate motherhood arrangements
- Interpretations, perspectives and intentions in surrogate motherhood
- Surrogacy and the law in the UK
- Ethics briefings
- Gay men's experiences of surrogacy clinics in India
- Iran’s experience with surrogate motherhood: an Islamic view and ethical concerns