In the recent UK debate on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill, there have been conflicting claims about the extent of public support for, or opposition to, human–animal hybrids. Self-selecting polls tend to show opposition to hybrids. Representative-sample polling shows spontaneous opposition but can elicit conditional approval of research, combined with underlying unease. Public opinion is very finely divided, with people generally opposed to this research unless it is likely to lead to medical advances.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None declared.
↵ii Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA); appendix D, question 2: individual (736 responses).7
↵iii HFEA, appendix D, question 3: individual (736 responses).7
↵iv HFEA, appendix D, question 2: organisation (74 responses).7
↵v HFEA, appendix D, question 3: organisation (74 responses).7
↵vi HFEA, appendix G: question: “Do the potential benefits outweigh any ethical concerns?” (153 participants).7
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- HFEA will defend challenge from Christian group on hybrid embryo research
- Fearing a non-existing Minotaur? The ethical challenges of research on cytoplasmic hybrid embryos
- UK regulatory body approves research using human-animal hybrid embryos
- Regulator gives green light to research using human-animal embryos
- MPs back scientists' plea to be able to create hybrid embryos
- Public support for hybrid embryos rises with knowledge, poll shows
- Regulator defends its decision to delay use of hybrid embryos
- Scientists plead for right to create interspecies embryos
- Creating and sacrificing embryos for stem cells
- New life for the HFEA?