Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Broadening consent—and diluting ethics?
- Bjørn Hofmann, Faculty of Health Care and Nursing, University College of Gjøvik, PO Box 1130, Blindern, N-2801 Gjøvik, Norway; bjoern.hofmann{at}hig.no
Citation
Broadening consent—and diluting ethics?
Publication history
- Received February 13, 2008
- Revised June 9, 2008
- Accepted June 18, 2008
- First published January 30, 2009.
Online issue publication
January 30, 2009
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2009 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- The ‘ Expiry Problem ’ of broad consent for biobank research - And why a meta consent model solves it
- The biobank consent debate: why ‘ meta - consent ’ is still the solution
- International requirements for consent in biobank research: qualitative review of research guidelines
- Ethics of dead participants: policy recommendations for biobank research
- Obtaining informed consent for genomics research in Africa: analysis of H3Africa consent documents
- Biobank research, informed consent and society. Towards a new alliance
- Practice evaluation of biobank ethics and governance: current needs and future perspectives
- The case against meta-consent: not only do Ploug and Holm not answer it, they make it even stronger
- Building on relationships of trust in biobank research
- Biobank research: who benefits from individual consent?