Aims and background: Little is known about how participants perceive prevention trials, particularly trials designed to prevent mental illness. This study examined participants’ motives for participating in a trial and their views of randomisation and the ability to withdraw from a randomised controlled trial (RCT) for prevention of depression.
Methods: Participants were older adults reporting elevated depression symptoms (N = 900) living in urban and regional locations in Australia who had consented to participate in an RCT of interventions to prevent depression. Participants rated their agreement with various statements describing motivations for enrolment in the trial and opinions regarding randomisation and withdrawal.
Results: The majority of participants expressed a triad of altruistic motivation for participation, relative lack of concern about randomisation and commitment to the trial. Certain subgroups of participants, such as women and those with higher depression scores, reported higher levels of concern about specific issues.
Conclusions: The findings suggest that participants enrolled in prevention trials for mental illness are likely to hold positive attitudes (eg, high commitment, low expectation of personal gain) towards research trials. The identification of relationships between key person factors and trial-related attitudes enabled profiling of participant groups, which can inform recruitment strategies and interactions of participants and research projects in future prevention trials.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Funding The Beyond Ageing Project is funded by beyondblue: the national depression initiative and the Office for an Ageing Australia, Department of Health and Ageing. This project was supported by an NHMRC project grant (332950) to Andrew Mackinnon. Helen Christensen is funded by an NHMRC Fellowship 366781.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- How to enhance recruitment of individuals at risk of rheumatoid arthritis into trials aimed at prevention: understanding the barriers and facilitators
- Is recruitment more difficult with a placebo arm in randomised controlled trials? A quasirandomised, interview based study
- Exploring non-retention in clinical trials: a meta-ethnographic synthesis of studies reporting participant reasons for drop out
- Preventive misconception and adolescents’ knowledge about HIV vaccine trials
- Cholesterol reduction and non-illness mortality: meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
- Willingness to participate in HIV-1 vaccine trials among young Thai men
- Antiangiogenic and antifibrogenic activity of pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) in bile duct-ligated portal hypertensive rats
- Uptake of breast cancer prevention and screening trials
- Addressing ethical challenges in HIV prevention research with people who inject drugs
- Attitudes towards clinical research among cancer trial participants and non-participants: an interview study using a Grounded Theory approach