Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Clinical ethics
Best interests, dementia and the Mental Capacity Act (2005)
  1. T Hope,
  2. A Slowther2,
  3. J Eccles3
  1. 1
    The Ethox Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  2. 2
    Clinical Ethics, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK
  3. 3
    Department of Elderly Medicine, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor T Hope, The Ethox Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LG, UK; tony.hope{at}


The Mental Capacity Act (2005) is an impressive piece of legislation that deserves serious ethical attention, but much of the commentary on the Act has focussed on its legal and practical implications rather than the underlying ethical concepts. This paper examines the approach that the Act takes to best interests. The Act does not provide an account of the underlying concept of best interests. Instead it lists factors that must be considered in determining best interests, and the Code of Practice to the Act states that this list is incomplete. This paper argues that this general approach is correct, contrary to some accounts of best interests. The checklist includes items that are unhelpful. Furthermore, neither the Act nor its Code of Practice provides sufficient guidance to carers faced with difficult decisions concerning best interests. This paper suggests ways in which the checklist can be developed and discusses cases that could be used in an updated Code of Practice.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • The concise argument
    Søren Holm

Other content recommended for you