Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Can the Catholic Church agree to condom use by HIV-discordant couples?
In the paper with this title, Luc Bovens argues that the Catholic Church ought to allow HIV-discordant couples to use condoms (see page 743). According to Catholic moral theology, intercourse is only permissible if it respects the natural purposes of sex, ie, the so-called “procreative” and “unitive” functions of sex. Condoms clearly thwart the procreative functions of sex and are therefore seen as morally illicit by the Church.
However, Bovens argues that there are special features of the situation faced by HIV-discordant couples that entail that their condom use is morally licit under the doctrine of double effect (DDE) as accepted by the Church. If a HIV-discordant couple pursues the unitive function of sex without using condoms, they run a significant risk that the unaffected partner will become infected. Condom use can diminish that risk significantly, and, if that is what the couple intends, they can invoke the DDE.
The main strand of Bovens’ argument …
Linked Articles
- Paper
- Paper
- Paper
- Paper
Other content recommended for you
- Can the Catholic Church agree to condom use by HIV-discordant couples?
- Genetic selection for deafness: the views of hearing children of deaf adults
- Can facilitated aid in dying be permitted by ‘double effect’? Some reflections from a recent New Zealand case
- The role of the principle of double effect in ethics education at US medical schools and its potential impact on pain management at the end of life
- Double effect: a useful rule that alone cannot justify hastening death
- Further clarity on cooperation and morality
- Response to Ronald M Perkin and David B Resnik: The agony of trying to match sanctity of life and patient-centred medical care
- Embryo loss and double effect
- Strengthening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer