Background: Lay persons’ judgements of the acceptability of the not uncommon practice of ending the life of a damaged neonate have not been studied.
Methods: A convenience sample of 1635 lay people in France rated how acceptable it would be for a physician to end a neonate’s life—by withholding care, withdrawing care, or active euthanasia—in 54 scenarios in which the neonate was diagnosed either with perinatal asphyxia or a genetic abnormality. The scenarios were all combinations of four factors: three levels of maturity or immaturity, three levels of severity of the health problem, three levels of parents’ preference concerning prolonging care and two levels of decision-making (with or without consulting the other caregivers).
Analyses: Analyses of variance of the participants’ responses were performed to determine the importance of each factor; the interactions among factors, with methods of ending life and with other patient characteristics; and the differences between asphyxia and genetic abnormality. A cluster analysis was performed to look for groups with different patterns of responses.
Results: Lay people assigned most importance to the parents’ request and to the severity of the problem. Except for a small group (12%) always opposed to ending life, they used a simple additive-type rule in integrating the information.
Implications: Most of this sample of French lay people are not categorically for or against ending the life of a damaged neonate, but judge its degree of acceptability by adding up those factors that seem most salient to them.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval The protocol was approved, as part of a larger study including neonatal nurses and physicians, by the Committee on Ethics of the Hospital of Beziers, France.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The acceptability among young Hindus and Muslims of actively ending the lives of newborns with genetic defects
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- End of life decision-making in neonatal care
- Letting babies die
- Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in preterm infants: association with neurodevelopmental outcomes
- The acceptability of ending a patient’s life
- Passive euthanasia
- Randomised controlled study of oral erythromycin for treatment of gastrointestinal dysmotility in preterm infants
- Euthanasia: above ground, below ground
- Outcomes for high risk New Zealand newborn infants in 1998–1999: a population based, national study