Article Text
Abstract
Infertility treatment is a speciality that has attracted considerable attention both from the public and bioethicists. The focus of this attention has mainly been on the dramatic dilemmas created by theses technologies. Relatively little is known, however, about how clinicians approach and resolve ethical issues on an everyday basis. The central aim of this study is to gain insight into these neglected aspects of practice. It was found that, for the clinicians, the process by which ethical decisions were made was of key importance. It will be argued that this focus on the process of decision-making is more than just empty proceduralism but is based on and facilitates certain substantive ethical principles. In conclusion, suggestions as to how ethical decision-making processes can be supported and improved in infertility practice will be made.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Additional supplementary data are published online only at http://jme.bmj.com/content/vol35/issue11
Competing interests None.
Ethics approval The study received ethics committee approval from the regional Multicentre Research Ethics Committee.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethical decision making during a healthcare crisis: a resource allocation framework and tool
- Research ethics committees: the role of ethics in a regulatory authority
- Ethical decision-making climate in the ICU: theoretical framework and validation of a self-assessment tool
- Ethics support in institutional elderly care: a review of the literature
- Evaluating interventions to improve ethical decision making in clinical practice: a review of the literature and reflections on the challenges posed
- Tragic choices and the role of administrative law
- Clinicians’ perspectives of parental decision-making following diagnosis of a severe congenital anomaly: a qualitative study
- Challenging misconceptions about clinical ethics support during COVID-19 and beyond: a legal update and future considerations
- A proposal for formal fairness requirements in triage emergency departments: publicity, accessibility, relevance, standardisability and accountability
- Ethical decision-making, passivity and pharmacy