Article Text
PDFCommentary
Re-consenting human subjects: ethical, legal and practical issues
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding This research was sponsored by the intramural programme of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH). It does not represent the views of the NIEHS or NIH.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Non-completion and informed consent
- Clinical Research From Proposal to Implementation
- Developing capacity to protect human research subjects in a post-conflict, resource-constrained setting: procedures and prospects
- A qualitative study of institutional review board members’ experience reviewing research proposals using emergency exception from informed consent
- Does Waiver of Written Informed Consent from the Institutional Review Board Affect Response Rate in a Low-Risk Research Study?
- Health service research: the square peg in human subjects protection regulations
- Ethical issues in Alzheimer’s disease research involving human subjects
- Ethics, human rights and HIV vaccine trials in low-income settings
- A rationale and framework for seeking remote electronic or phone consent approval in endovascular stroke trials – special relevance in the COVID-19 environment and beyond
- Work efficiency improvement of >90% after implementation of an annual inpatient blood products administration consent form