Article info
The concise argument
The concise argument
Citation
The concise argument
Publication history
- First published October 30, 2009.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics. All rights reserved.
Other content recommended for you
- Fallacies in the arguments for new technology: the case of proton therapy
- Pragmatic randomised clinical trial of proton versus photon therapy for patients with non-metastatic breast cancer: the Radiotherapy Comparative Effectiveness (RadComp) Consortium trial protocol
- Proton beam radiation for iris melanoma: case series and review of literature
- Investigating survival, quality of life and cognition in PROton versus photon therapy for IDH-mutated diffuse grade 2 and 3 GLIOmas (PRO-GLIO): a randomised controlled trial in Norway and Sweden
- Proton beam therapy: the next disruptive innovation in healthcare?
- The role of proton therapy in gynecological radiation oncology
- Proton beam therapy for malignant transformation of intracranial epidermoid cyst
- Effects of plaque brachytherapy and proton beam radiotherapy on prognostic testing: a comparison of uveal melanoma genotyped by microsatellite analysis
- How NHS investment in proton beam therapy is coming to fruition
- Effects of proton beam irradiation on uveal melanomas: a comparative study of Ki-67 expression in irradiated versus non-irradiated melanomas