Article info
PDFResponse
On how to interpret the role of the future within the abortion debate
- Correspondence to Dr E Di Nucci, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland; ezio.dinucci{at}ucd.ie
Citation
On how to interpret the role of the future within the abortion debate
Publication history
- Received May 26, 2009
- Accepted May 27, 2009
- First published September 30, 2009.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Institute of Medical Ethics. All rights reserved.
Other content recommended for you
- Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed
- Abortion: Strong’s counterexamples fail
- Strong's objections to the future of value account
- Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the ‘future like ours’ argument
- A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”
- A future like ours revisited
- The morality of abortion and the deprivation of futures
- Savulescu’s objections to the future of value argument
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- Abortion and human nature