Article Text
Abstract
Locked inpatient units are an increasing phenomenon, introduced in response to unforseen abscondences and suicides of patients. This paper identifies some value issues concerning the practice of locked psychiatric inpatient units. Broad strategies, practicalities and ethical matters that must be considered in inpatient mental health services are also explored. The authors draw on the published research and commentary to derive relevant information to provide to patients and staff regarding the aims and rationales of locked units. Further debate is warranted in relation to best practice. Inpatient staff need to be aware of their practice values, be able to access education and supervision and negotiate apparent contradictions. Further patient/clinician focused enquiry is necessary to mitigate the negative and stigmatising effects of locked mental health units.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Locking doors in mental health hospitals does not reduce suicide or absconding, shows study
- Safe clinical practice for patients hospitalised in mental health wards during a suicidal crisis: qualitative study of patient experiences
- Safe clinical practice for patients hospitalised in a suicidal crisis: a study protocol for a qualitative case study
- The gap between voluntary admission and detention in mental health units
- Retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics, involuntary admissions under the Mental Health Act 1983, and number of psychiatric beds in England 1996-2006
- “Idiots, infants, and the insane”: mental illness and legal incompetence
- Locking wards has no place in psychiatric rehabilitation, says royal college
- Voluntary patients are being kept on locked wards, says commission
- Reinstitutionalisation in mental health care: comparison of data on service provision from six European countries
- Hospital admissions for self harm after discharge from psychiatric inpatient care: cohort study