Clinical obligations and public health programmes: healthcare provider reasoning about managing the incidental results of newborn screening

F A Miller; R Z Hayeems; Y Bombard; J Little; J C Carroll; B Wilson; J Allanson; M Paynter; J P Bytautas; R Christensen; P Chakraborty

doi:10.1136/jme.2009.030346

Article menu

Article
Text
Article
info
Citation
Tools
Share
Responses
Article
metrics
Alerts

PDF

Paper

Genetics

Clinical obligations and public health programmes: healthcare provider reasoning about managing the incidental results of newborn screening

Share this article

Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.

Share This Article:

Email this article to a friend

We will not keep your email address; we ask for it so your friend knows the email isn't spam.

Your email: *

Your name: *

Send to: *

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.

You are going to email the following Clinical obligations and public health programmes: healthcare provider reasoning about managing the incidental results of newborn screening

Message subject: (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of Medical Ethics

Message body: (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of Medical Ethics web site.

Your personal message:

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Log in using your username and password

For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?

Forgot your user name or password?

Other content recommended for you

Evaluation of a decision aid for incidental genomic results, the Genomics ADvISER: protocol for a mixed methods randomised controlled trial
Salma Shickh et al., BMJ Open, 2018
Health outcomes, utility and costs of returning incidental results from genomic sequencing in a Canadian cancer population: protocol for a mixed - methods randomised controlled trial
Salma Shickh et al., BMJ Open, 2019
Processing of positive newborn screening results: a qualitative exploration of current practice in England
Jane Chudleigh et al., BMJ Open, 2020
Attitudes of healthcare professionals and parents regarding genetic testing for violent traits in childhood
E Campbell et al., Journal of Medical Ethics, 2004
Two faces of patient advocacy: the current controversy in newborn screening
Cosby G Arnold, Journal of Medical Ethics, 2013
Stakeholder attitudes towards the role and application of informed consent for newborn bloodspot screening: a study protocol
S G Nicholls et al., BMJ Open, 2014
Implementation of universal newborn bloodspot screening for sickle cell disease and other clinically significant haemoglobinopathies in England: screening results for 2005–7
A Streetly et al., Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2008
Implications of carrier identification in newborn screening for cystic fibrosis
E P Parsons et al., Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 2003
Efficacy of a touchscreen computer based family cancer history questionnaire and subsequent cancer risk assessment
Judith Westman et al., Journal of Medical Genetics, 2000
Positive screening and carrier results for the England - wide universal newborn sickle cell screening programme by ethnicity and area for 2005–07
Allison Streetly et al., Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2010

Log in using your username and password

Main menu

Log in using your username and password

You are here

Share this article

Email this article to a friend

Request permissions

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Log in using your username and password

Other content recommended for you