Article Text
Paper
Ethics
All hail the new flesh: some thoughts on scarification, children and adults
Abstract
Body art as expressed through non-therapeutic bodily modification is extremely popular, with techniques ranging from the commonplace such as ear piercing to the more esoteric forms such as tongue splitting. Scarification is one such body art practice that is becoming popular as an alternative to tattooing and ear piercing. This paper begins by outlining the regulatory problems that scarification poses. It then goes on to argue that although there is a reasonable case for permitting competent adults to make use of scarification, the practice should not be made available to minors.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None.
Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- The concise argument
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- An observational study of patients’ attitudes to tattoos and piercings on their physicians: the ART study
- Awareness of the risk of endocarditis associated with tattooing and body piercing among patients with congenital heart disease and paediatric cardiologists in the United Kingdom
- Body Art: Marks of Identity
- Could boxing be banned? A legal and epidemiological perspective
- Body piercing with fatal consequences
- Erasing the stigma: tattoos in the medical workforce
- A covenant with the status quo? Male circumcision and the new BMA guidance to doctors
- Body piercing in England: a survey of piercing at sites other than earlobe
- Irreversible bodily interventions in children
- Highlights from this issue