Abortion is one of the most divisive topics in healthcare. Proponents and opponents hold strong views. Some health workers who oppose abortion assert a right of conscientious objection to it, a position itself that others find unethical. Even if allowance for objection should be made, it is not clear how far it should extend. Can conscientious objection be given as a reason not to refer when a woman requests her doctor to do so? This paper explores the idea of the general practitioner (GP) who declines to make a direct referral for abortion, asking the woman to see another GP instead. The purpose is to defend the claim that an appeal to conscientious objection in this way can be reasonable and ethical.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Freedom of conscience in Europe? An analysis of three cases of midwives with conscientious objection to abortion
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer
- Professional and conscience-based refusals: the case of the psychiatrist's harmful prescription
- Conscientious objection in Italy
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes
- Conscientious objection: unmasking the impartial spectator
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- A clear case for conscience in healthcare practice
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection in healthcare: why tribunals might be the answer