Article info
PDFResearch ethics
Can we justify eliminating coercive measures in psychiatry?
- Dr E J D Prinsen, Zwolse Poort, Institute for Mental Health West-Overijssel, Knapenveldsweg 1/P.O. Box 110, 8102 RR/8000 AC Raalte, The Netherlands; e.prinsen{at}zwolsepoort.nl
Citation
Can we justify eliminating coercive measures in psychiatry?
Publication history
- Received August 20, 2007
- Revised February 25, 2008
- Accepted April 28, 2008
- First published December 22, 2008.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2009 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Design features that reduce the use of seclusion and restraint in mental health facilities: a rapid systematic review
- Seclusion and its context in acute inpatient psychiatric care
- What moral work can Nussbaum’s account of human dignity do in the context of dementia care?
- Relational autonomy, vulnerability and embodied dignity as normative foundations of dignified dementia care
- Whose dignity? Resolving ambiguities in the scope of “human dignity” in the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights
- Exploring the frequency, duration and experience of seclusion for women in a forensic mental health setting: a mixed-methods study protocol
- Ethical dilemmas in forensic psychiatry: two illustrative cases
- Potential impact of the Human Rights Act on psychiatric practice: the best of British values?
- Making sense of dignity
- How, and when, can I restrain a patient?