Article Text
Abstract
National and international guidelines outlining ethical conduct in research involving humans and animals have evolved into large and complex documents making the process of gaining ethics approval a complicated task for researchers in the area. Researchers, in particular those who are relatively new to the ethics approval process, can struggle to understand the parts of an ethics guideline that apply to their research and the nature of their ethical obligations to trial participants. With the scope of medical research likely to continue to expand in the future, it is clear that ethics guidelines will only increase in complexity and number. This paper describes one possible solution to the problem: the use of an internet-based expert system to intelligently and interactively distribute the information stored in ethics guidelines to individual researchers. This paper also details how one such system was designed and tested with respect to Australian medical research ethics guidelines.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Murru Minya–informing the development of practical recommendations to support ethical conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health research: a protocol for a national mixed-methods study
- Is the UN receiving ethical approval for its research with human participants?
- To stop or not to stop: dissent and undue burden as reasons to stop participation in paediatric research
- Problems and development strategies for research ethics committees in China’s higher education institutions
- Consent processes in cluster-randomised trials in residential facilities for older adults: a systematic review of reporting practices and proposed guidelines
- Towards an appropriate ethics framework for Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems (HDSS): learning from issues faced in diverse HDSS in sub-Saharan Africa
- Assessing the transparency of informed consent in feasibility and pilot studies: a single-centre quality assurance study protocol
- The standard of care debate: against the myth of an “international consensus opinion”
- Partnership as an ethical model for medical research in developing countries: the example of the “implementation trial”
- Process evaluation of a primary healthcare validation study of a culturally adapted depression screening tool for use by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: study protocol