Article info
PDFNorman Daniels symposium
Justice and procedure: how does “accountability for reasonableness” result in fair limit-setting decisions?
- Dr A Rid, née Shulz-Baldes, Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 1C118, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; schulzbaldesa{at}cc.nih.gov
Citation
Justice and procedure: how does “accountability for reasonableness” result in fair limit-setting decisions?
Publication history
- Received January 14, 2008
- Accepted April 22, 2008
- First published December 22, 2008.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2009 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Just health: replies and further thoughts
- Justice in action? Introduction to the minisymposium on Norman Daniels’ Just health: meeting health needs fairly
- Moral ambivalence towards the Cancer Drugs Fund
- Integrating philosophy, policy and practice to create a just and fair health service
- Age rationing and prudential lifespan account in Norman Daniels’ Just health
- Principles of justice in health care rationing
- The ethical canary: narrow reflective equilibrium as a source of moral justification in healthcare priority-setting
- Inequalities and healthcare reform in Chile: equity of what?
- Can medical algorithms be fair? Three ethical quandaries and one dilemma
- Ethical issues in funding orphan drug research and development