Current guidelines on investigators' responsibilities to communicate research results to study participants may differ on (1) whether investigators should proactively re-contact participants, (2) the type of results to be offered, (3) the need for clinical relevance before disclosure, and (4) the stage of research at which results should be offered. Lack of consistency on these issues, however, does not undermine investigators' obligation to offer to disclose research results: an obligation rooted firmly in the principle of respect for research participants.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None declared.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed are the authors’ own. They do not represent any position or policy of the United States National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service or Department of Health and Human Services.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Duty to disclose what? Querying the putative obligation to return research results to participants
- What does ‘respect for persons’ require? Attitudes and reported practices of genetics researchers in informing research participants about research
- Attitudes of African-American parents about biobank participation and return of results for themselves and their children
- Is it ethical to deny genetic research participants individualised results?
- ‘Ethical responsibility’ or ‘a whole can of worms’: differences in opinion on incidental finding review and disclosure in neuroimaging research from focus group discussions with participants, parents, IRB members, investigators, physicians and community members
- Taking it to the bank: the ethical management of individual findings arising in secondary research
- Acknowledging awareness: informing families of individual research results for patients in the vegetative state
- Informing research participants of research results: analysis of Canadian university based research ethics board policies
- Legitimate requests and indecent proposals: matters of justice in the ethical assessment of phase I trials involving competent patients
- Developing an ethics framework for living donor transplantation