Responses

Download PDFPDF
Research ethics committees: the role of ethics in a regulatory authority
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    RECs as regulators

    While I welcome any discussion of the ethics review system in the UK and how it may be developing into a broader regulatory structure, any analysis needs to be based on an accurate understand both of the current academic literature in this area and upon current REC practice. Unfortunately McGuinness’ recent article has problems in both of these departments.

    Given that one of her main conclusions is that provide...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.

Other content recommended for you