Global medical ethics
“That’s Africa”: acceptance as a form of negligence
Other content recommended for you
- Recognising our ‘invisible infants’: there is no internationally agreed definition of live birth—is this ethically acceptable?
- Ethical dilemmas in medical humanitarian practice: cases for reflection from Médecins Sans Frontières
- A proposed new international convention supporting the rights of pregnant women and girls and their newborn infants
- Medical and social issues of child refugees in Europe
- Confronting Africa's health crisis: more of the same will not be enough
- The human rights responsibilities of multinational tobacco companies
- Female genital mutilation: what every paediatrician should know
- Circumcision of male infants as a human rights violation
- An ethical approach to resolving value conflicts in child protection
- ‘Inglan is a bitch’: hostile NHS charging regulations contravene the ethical principles of the medical profession
Jump to comment:
In response to your comments:
Ethics is about choices, but I do not agree that health care workers do not have choices. The choices available to us are obviously very varied. Some may well be able to change the number of nurses in a hospital (or have the ability to lobby for that kind of change). Alternatively in your cancer example, your choice may be just to turn the patient or to provide a cushion. The...
If I understand ethics correctly, it has to do with "oughts" - what we should do, or ought to do. This assumes that we have a choice. It is not unethical to "let" someone die of a highly aggressive cancer of unknown etiology, for example; we have no choice in the matter. We do have a choice on whether to perform a 1st trimester abortion on demand, or whether to pull the plug on Karen Quinlan. Ethics implies choice. Delan...