Article Text
Abstract
Informed consent needs to be practised within a culture of openness if it is to enhance public trust in medical procedures around death. Openness should entail patients not just receiving information from doctors, but also having the right to see certain medical procedures. This article proposes in particular that it would be desirable for the public to be allowed to attend an autopsy of a person they do not know. Evidence from the UK, where members of the public may go backstage to witness the process of cremation, the other technical process in which dead bodies are violently but legitimately assaulted, suggests benefits from a policy of openness. When a family consents to cremation in Britain, their consent is only minimally informed, but the system has nothing to hide, and trust is high. This suggests that the opportunity for lay people also to witness certain medical procedures might do more to restore public trust in medical procedures around death than a narrow interpretation of informed consent in which information is controlled by the profession.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests: None declared.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Stored human tissue: an ethical perspective on the fate of anonymous, archival material
- The public autopsy: somewhere between art, education, and entertainment
- Open organisational culture: what does it entail? Healthcare stakeholders reaching consensus by means of a Delphi technique
- Israeli doctors may now use cadavers for training purposes
- Organ retention and return: problems of consent
- Mind the gap: are NHS trusts falling short of recommended standards for consent to autopsy?
- Ethical and sociocultural challenges in managing dead bodies during epidemics and natural disasters
- Right of the living dead? Consent to experimental surgery in the event of cortical death
- Public hygiene and funeral rituals during the Risorgimento: mummies and ashes
- Is posthumous semen retrieval ethically permissible?