Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Information and consent for newborn screening: practices and attitudes of service providers
- Dr N J Kerruish, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin, New Zealand; nikki.kerruish{at}stonebow.otago.ac.nz
Citation
Information and consent for newborn screening: practices and attitudes of service providers
Publication history
- Accepted January 24, 2008
- First published August 29, 2008.
Online issue publication
August 29, 2008
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Feasibility study assessing equitable delivery of newborn pulse oximetry screening in New Zealand’s midwifery-led maternity setting
- Infant hearing screening: route to informed choice
- Biobanks for non-clinical purposes and the new law on forensic biobanks: does the Italian context protect the rights of minors?
- Stakeholder attitudes towards the role and application of informed consent for newborn bloodspot screening: a study protocol
- Parental consent for newborn screening in southern Taiwan
- Risk of perinatal mortality in the first year of midwifery practice in New Zealand: analysis of a retrospective national cohort
- Newborn screening: new developments, new dilemmas
- Harm isn't all you need: parental discretion and medical decisions for a child
- Better to hesitate at the threshold of compulsion: PKU testing and the concept of family autonomy in Eire
- Methods for evaluating the benefits and harms of antenatal and newborn screening programmes adopted by health economic assessments: protocol for a systematic review