Article info
Research ethics
Evaluating solutions to sponsorship bias
- Mr M Doucet, Department of Philosophy, John Watson Hall, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6; 1wmd1{at}queensu.ca
Citation
Evaluating solutions to sponsorship bias
Publication history
- Received July 20, 2007
- Revised October 1, 2007
- Accepted October 9, 2007
- First published July 30, 2008.
Online issue publication
July 30, 2008
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Industry sponsorship bias in research findings: a network meta-analysis of LDL cholesterol reduction in randomised trials of statins
- Industry sponsorship bias in cost effectiveness analysis: registry based analysis
- Do we really know how many clinical trials are conducted ethically? Why research ethics committee review practices need to be strengthened and initial steps we could take to strengthen them
- Sponsorship bias in published pharmacoeconomic evaluations of national reimbursement negotiation drugs in China: a systematic review
- Making the best use of available evidence: the case of new generation antidepressants
- Selected highlights from other veterinary journals
- Moving towards less biased research
- “Asset exchange”—interactions between patient groups and pharmaceutical industry: Australian qualitative study
- Evidence-informed recommendations to reduce dissemination bias in clinical research: conclusions from the OPEN (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) project based on an international consensus meeting
- Industry funding of patient and health consumer organisations: systematic review with meta-analysis