Article info
Law, ethics and medicine
Human reproductive cloning and reasons for deprivation
- Dr D A Jensen, Brigham Young University, 4093 JFSB, Department of Philosophy, Provo, UT 84604, USA; davidj{at}byu.edu
Citation
Human reproductive cloning and reasons for deprivation
Publication history
- Received June 21, 2007
- Revised November 16, 2007
- Revised December 17, 2008
- First published July 30, 2008.
Online issue publication
July 30, 2008
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Just another reproductive technology? The ethics of human reproductive cloning as an experimental medical procedure
- Reproductive cloning in humans and therapeutic cloning in primates: is the ethical debate catching up with the recent scientific advances?
- Emotional reactions to human reproductive cloning
- Reproductive cloning combined with genetic modification
- What exactly is an exact copy? And why it matters when trying to ban human reproductive cloning in Australia
- A resource-based version of the argument that cloning is an affront to human dignity
- Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies
- Embryonic stem cells: the disagreement debate and embryonic stem cell research in Israel
- Why the apparent haste to clone humans?
- How medical ethical principles are applied in treatment with artificial insemination by donors (AID) in Hunan, China: effective practice at the Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya