Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Evaluating ethics consultation: randomised controlled trial is not the right tool
- Dr Y-Y Chen, Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA; yxc96{at}case.edu
Citation
Evaluating ethics consultation: randomised controlled trial is not the right tool
Publication history
- Received July 5, 2007
- Revised October 15, 2007
- Accepted October 24, 2007
- First published July 30, 2008.
Online issue publication
July 30, 2008
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Placebo effects and racial and ethnic health disparities: an unjust and underexplored connection
- Placebos in chronic pain: evidence, theory, ethics, and use in clinical practice
- Open-label placebo clinical trials: is it the rationale, the interaction or the pill?
- Placebo effects and the molecular biological components involved
- Bacteremia Antibiotic Length Actually Needed for Clinical Effectiveness (BALANCE) randomised clinical trial: study protocol
- Evaluating probiotics for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a randomised placebo-controlled multicentre trial protocol and statistical analysis plan for PROSPECT
- Effectiveness of the ABCDEF bundle on delirium, functional outcomes and quality of life in intensive care patients: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial with embedded process evaluation
- Intensive versus standard physical rehabilitation therapy in the critically ill (EPICC): a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial
- Randomised placebo-controlled trials of surgery: ethical analysis and guidelines
- The placebo effect in psychiatry: problem or solution?