Article info
PDFCommentary
On acts, omissions and responsibility
- Dr J Coggon, Centre for Social Ethics and Policy and Institute for Science, Ethics and Innovation, School of Law, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; John.Coggon{at}manchester.ac.uk
Citation
On acts, omissions and responsibility
Publication history
- Accepted March 3, 2008
- First published July 30, 2008.
Online issue publication
July 30, 2008
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group & Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- A case for justified non-voluntary active euthanasia: exploring the ethics of the Groningen Protocol
- To kill is not the same as to let die: a reply to Coggon
- The ethics of killing and letting die: active and passive euthanasia
- Passive euthanasia
- Assisted suicide and the killing of people? Maybe. Physician-assisted suicide and the killing of patients? No: the rejection of Shaw's new perspective on euthanasia
- Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability
- A defence of a new perspective on euthanasia
- Attitudes towards euthanasia in Iran: the role of altruism
- Moral duties and euthanasia: why to kill is not necessarily the same as to let die
- Life support and euthanasia, a perspective on Shaw's new perspective