Are there persuasive approaches to embryonic stem cell (ESC) research that appeal, not just to those fellow-citizens in one’s own ideological camp, nor just to those undecided citizens in the middle, but to those citizens on the other side of the issue? I believe that there are such arguments and in this short paper I try to develop one of them. In particular, I argue that certain beliefs shared by some proponents and some opponents of ESC research—beliefs about the personal identity and moral status of those who are victims of terrible brain diseases—are beliefs that should lead us to adopt a qualified endorsement of ESC research.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Embryonic stem cells: the disagreement debate and embryonic stem cell research in Israel
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Human embryonic stem cells and respect for life
- Ethics for embryos
- How to depolarise the ethical debate over human embryonic stem cell research (and other ethical debates too!)
- Embryo as epiphenomenon: some cultural, social and economic forces driving the stem cell debate
- Why two arguments from probability fail and one argument from Thomson’s analogy of the violinist succeeds in justifying embryo destruction in some situations
- Stem cells, embryos, and the environment: a context for both science and ethics
- How reproductive and regenerative medicine meet in a Chinese fertility clinic. Interviews with women about the donation of embryos to stem cell research