Article Text
Clinical ethics
The “four quadrants” approach to clinical ethics case analysis; an application and review
Abstract
In 1982, Jonsen, Siegler and Winslade published Clinical Ethics, in which they described the “four quadrants” approach, a new method of analysing clinical ethics cases. Although the book is now in its 6th edition, a literature search has revealed only one academic paper demonstrating the method at work. This paper is an attempt to start filling this gap. As a way of describing and testing the approach, I apply the four quadrants method to a detailed clinical ethics case. The analysis is interspersed with reflections on the method itself. It is hoped that this experiment will encourage ethicists and clinicians to devote more attention to this neglected approach.
- four quadrants
- clinical ethics
- methodology
- four principles
- casuistry
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Sources of bias in clinical ethics case deliberation
- What kinds of cases do paediatricians refer to clinical ethics? Insights from 184 case referrals at an Australian paediatric hospital
- Clinical ethicists’ perspectives on organisational ethics in healthcare organisations
- What is happening during case deliberations in clinical ethics committees? A pilot study
- What is it to do good medical ethics? On the concepts of ‘good’ and ‘goodness’ in medical ethics
- Drawing the line in clinical treatment of companion animals: recommendations from an ethics working party
- Ethical considerations for performing decompressive craniectomy as a life-saving intervention for severe traumatic brain injury
- Limitation of the diagnostic effort in paediatrics
- Respect for autonomy: deciding what is good for oneself
- Ethical dilemmas in the acute setting: a framework for clinicians