Article info
PDFEthics
Caring for risky patients: duty or virtue?
- Tom Tomlinson, Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences, Michigan State University, C208 E Fee, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; tomlins4{at}msu.edu
Citation
Caring for risky patients: duty or virtue?
Publication history
- Received June 26, 2007
- Revised September 13, 2007
- Accepted September 19, 2007
- First published May 29, 2008.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Severe acute respiratory syndrome and its impact on professionalism: qualitative study of physicians' behaviour during an emerging healthcare crisis
- Liver injury is independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19
- SARS: experience from the emergency department, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
- Infection control for SARS in a tertiary neonatal centre
- Developing the duty to treat: HIV, SARS, and the next epidemic
- The rationale of fever surveillance to identify patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome in Taiwan
- Ethics and SARS: lessons from Toronto
- Outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in a tertiary hospital in Singapore, linked to an index patient with atypical presentation: epidemiological study
- Appropriate use of personal protective equipment among healthcare workers in public sector hospitals and primary healthcare polyclinics during the SARS outbreak in Singapore
- Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): epidemiology and clinical features