There has been a significant increase in the use of radiological services in the past 30 years. There are many reasons for this, but one has received little attention: the increased role of patient autonomy in healthcare. Patients demand x rays, CT scans, MRI, and positron emission tomography scans. The key question in this article is how a moral principle, such as respect for patient autonomy, can influence the extension of radiological services. A literature review reveals how patient autonomy is acknowledged in radiology, and how it is used both to explain and to justify the increase in radiological examinations. Furthermore, it also shows how the premises favouring patients’ exercise of their autonomy are not always present, which makes patient autonomy subject to adverse side effects and even abuse. Patient autonomy can be used to reduce the professionals’ responsibility for radiological examinations (by avoiding complaints and lawsuits), to increase the popularity of the profession (by giving the people what they want), to increase the income of the professionals or their institutions, and to promote professional activity. Patient autonomy intended to reduce paternalism, to legitimise otherwise morally unjustifiable actions (such as exposure to radiation), and to protect patients, can easily be used as a moral means for opposite ends. These adverse effects are not peculiar to radiology. However, they emerge particularly clearly in explanations and justifications of the substantial increase in radiological services, as well as in debates on overuse of radiological services.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Competing interests: None declared.
↵i The estimated level of unnecessary examinations is reported to be between 10% and 40% in industrialised countries,6–11 and it is argued that increased medical imaging does not result in better healthcare outcomes.12 13 Although overuse of radiological examination is morally relevant, it is relevant here only with respect to highlighting the role of patient autonomy in the increase of radiological examinations.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Effect of electronic health records in ambulatory care: retrospective, serial, cross sectional study
- Ideals of patient autonomy in clinical decision making: a study on the development of a scale to assess patients’ and physicians’ views
- Autonomy and negatively informed consent
- Capturing and promoting the autonomy of capacitous vulnerable adults
- Can we justify eliminating coercive measures in psychiatry?
- Pressure and coercion in the care for the addicted: ethical perspectives
- Ethics of patient activation: exploring its relation to personal responsibility, autonomy and health disparities
- Autonomy in medical ethics after O’Neill
- First among equals? Adaptive preferences and the limits of autonomy in medical ethics
- Ethical impact of suboptimal referrals on delivery of care in radiology department