Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Abortion and human nature
- Dr D Marquis, Department of Philosophy, 1445 Jayhawk Blvd, Room 3090 University of Kansas Lawrence, Kansas 66045-75, USA; dmarquis{at}ku.edu
Citation
Abortion and human nature
Publication history
- Received October 26, 2007
- Accepted October 26, 2007
- First published May 29, 2008.
Online issue publication
May 29, 2008
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- The “future like ours” argument and human embryonic stem cell research
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Abortion: Strong’s counterexamples fail
- Abortion, embryo destruction and the future of value argument
- Savulescu’s objections to the future of value argument
- Strong's objections to the future of value account
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed
- Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the ‘future like ours’ argument
- A critique of “the best secular argument against abortion”