Article info
PDFClinical ethics
The “future like ours” argument and human embryonic stem cell research
- A Kuflik, Department of Philosophy, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05401, USA; akuflik{at}uvm.edu
Citation
The “future like ours” argument and human embryonic stem cell research
Publication history
- Received May 9, 2007
- Accepted June 14, 2007
- First published May 29, 2008.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Abortion and human nature
- Is a consensus possible on stem cell research? Moral and political obstacles
- Stem cells, embryos, and the environment: a context for both science and ethics
- Potentiality of embryonic stem cells: an ethical problem even with alternative stem cell sources
- Regenerative medicine: stem cells and the science of monstrosity
- Embryonic stem cell production through therapeutic cloning has fewer ethical problems than stem cell harvest from surplus IVF embryos
- What’s in a name? Embryos, entities, and ANTities in the stem cell debate
- Islet and stem cell transplantation for treating diabetes
- Embryonic stem cell research is not dehumanising us
- Human embryonic stem cells and respect for life