Article info
PDFEditorial
Phase IV research: innovation in need of ethics
- Ghislaine van Thiel, University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; g.j.m.w.vanthiel{at}umcutrecht.nl
Citation
Phase IV research: innovation in need of ethics
Publication history
- Received December 31, 2007
- Accepted January 16, 2008
- First published May 29, 2008.
Online issue publication
April 27, 2016
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
2008 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
Other content recommended for you
- Analysis of the status of informed consent in medical research involving human subjects in public hospitals in Shanghai
- How to handle informed consent in longitudinal studies when participants have a limited understanding of the study
- Subjects’ views of obligations to ensure post-trial access to drugs, care and information: qualitative results from the Experiences of Participants in Clinical Trials (EPIC) study
- What is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics
- Fair subject selection in clinical research: formal equality of opportunity
- Diversity in clinical research: public health and social justice imperatives
- Scientific research is a moral duty
- A critical appraisal of clinical trials conducted and subsequent drug approvals in India and South Africa
- Screening and Evaluation of Study Subjects in Patient-Oriented Research
- Assent for children's participation in research is incoherent and wrong