Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Worries about safety of approved drugs have pushed post registration research (phase IV) to become the fastest growing drug research phase. Until recently, phase IV studies were mainly conducted for marketing purposes and run much like a phase III trial—at institutions with experienced investigators and a list of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Innovative phase IV studies involve ordinary physicians in research naïve communities. This brings ethical issues familiar to medical research into clinical practice. As a consequence, individual physicians are challenged to protect scientific integrity and to secure the ethical conduct of research. Several ethical issues need to be addressed in the process of developing a scientifically sound and ethically high principled practice of phase IV research.
PHASE IV
Essential to phase IV research is the focus on how drugs work in the real world. The research goal may be to explore a specific pharmacological effect, to establish the incidence of adverse reactions, or to determine the effects of long-term administration of a drug. They may also be designed to establish a new clinical indication for a drug.1 Subjects may or may not be randomised, and the studies typically involve large numbers of patient-subjects and physicians.
Doubts concerning the scientific rigor and clinical value have put postmarketing research in a poor light. However, high quality phase IV research is badly needed to further pharmaceutical science. First, because it can provide reliable data on the effectiveness, safety and optimal use of a drug in treated populations.2 3 In pre-registration clinical trials (phase I–III), a pharmaceutical product is studied under unrealistic circumstances. Under-representation of women and elderly are common and the concomitant use of medicines is usually extremely restrictive in these trials.4 Second, phase IV can provide much needed data for evidence-based …
Footnotes
Competing interests: None.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Analysis of the status of informed consent in medical research involving human subjects in public hospitals in Shanghai
- How to handle informed consent in longitudinal studies when participants have a limited understanding of the study
- Subjects’ views of obligations to ensure post-trial access to drugs, care and information: qualitative results from the Experiences of Participants in Clinical Trials (EPIC) study
- What is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics
- Fair subject selection in clinical research: formal equality of opportunity
- Diversity in clinical research: public health and social justice imperatives
- Scientific research is a moral duty
- A critical appraisal of clinical trials conducted and subsequent drug approvals in India and South Africa
- Screening and Evaluation of Study Subjects in Patient-Oriented Research
- Assent for children's participation in research is incoherent and wrong